Assessment & Reading Rubrics
Assessment & Reading Rubrics
Assessing Retellings
✴Story Retelling Rubric/Louisiana Voice
✴Story RetellingRubric U Tube
✴Retell a Story Cube U Tube
Story Retelling Summary Analysis
Score the retelling on an 8 point rating scale. Each item below is worth 1 point.
1.Begins story with an introduction.
2.Names main character(s)
3.Includes information about setting (time or place)
4.Refers to the main goal or problem.
5.Includes important events that highlight the beginning , middle, and end of story.
6.Keeps the ideas in sequence.
7. Names the solution to the problem aor the attainment of the goal.
8. Provides a conclusion related to the story.
Author unknown
Assessment
Assessment focuses on what learners can do. It includes observing and recording progress in authentic activities .
For guidance in evaluating emergent readers, you will want the expert’s guidance of Marie Clay found in her
✴Assessing Concept of Print - teacher’s words and individual check lists
Assessing Concept of Print Video!
Marie Clay’s Survey is very thorough and accurate. Training is needed to administer the test.
•Observation Survey-YouTube 2/2015
• 5 Observation Survey You Tube5/12/13
Running Records
It is a "given" that teachers continuously take Running Records. An ideal time is during Group Reading time when the students reread a story with a partner.
The teacher very likely will only hear a few students during a reading session but RR can be continued at the next rereading of a text.
If the teacher marks off three sections in the book with the same number of words- with long stories a 100 word section-it is quick and easy to compute. With Emergent readers the entire story can be used. If a teacher uses less than a 100 words e.g. 75 she/he could have a chart stating score
for each number of possible errors - unless the teacher is a math whizz. There is a program for calculating http://www.wordcalc.com/runningrecord/
Marking off 3 sections will ensure a more positive survey- the student sitting next to the reader will have an advantage so a different section should be chosen.
If the teacher has wheels on her/his chair, the teacher can easily scoot around while the children in the group are rereading their story with a partner. Taking RR has to be quick an easy because the teacher has to keep aware of all students. With practice the teacher can listen, tick, record,and be aware of her/his other students.
Constant observing of the number and types of errors is important to note progress or regression.
A teacher senses the ability/ progress of her students via observing throughout the day. The teacher doesn't need the thorough assessment that is given
school wide except at the beginning of the school year and then at the end to note progress.
★Running Records-YouTube illustrated on white board
Most authorities define three reading levels.
•Independent Reading Level. Unassisted easy oral reading by a child with no more than five errors per 100 running words and with 100 percent accuracy on comprehension questions about the story-
•Instructional Reading Level. This is the best level for learning new vocabulary. It requires the assistance of a teacher or tutor. The word error range allowed while reading orally to the teacher is from 5 to 10 word calling errors per 100 words of text with at least 80 percent comprehension on simple recall questions about the story. This is where the best progress is made in reading. Children who are forced or permitted to attempt reading beyond the 5-word error limit soon begin to feel frustration when in an instructional setting.
• Frustration Reading Level. This is too hard for the reader. Word errors are over 10 per 100 running words of text. Comprehension questions are below 70 percent accuracy. Unfortunately, teachers sometimes allow this to happen, especially when the words missed are basic vocabulary
•sight words, such as "was" for "saw" and "what/that." The practice of having young children work on frustration level is
•not professionally sound. It is, however, all too often observed in the classrooms of well-meaning teachers.
Ms. McGown “Formal evaluations such as placement tests, standardized tests, and unit tests (we only use unit tests in our first grade) allow teachers to determine mastery of a particular skill and show where a child performs in relation to a larger group. However, performance tasks such as a writing activity, story retelling, oral presentation, or other projects can be assessed effectively using a rubric. Rubrics are scoring guides based on specific criteria for quality work.”
Rubrics for Comprehension
Benchmarks
Word accuracy
92 - 95% instructional level (60-75% comprehension)
96-100% and above-independent (75-100% comprehension)
90% or below - too hard; frustration level (60% or less comprehension)
★Top 10 Ways to Assess Your Students Busy Teacher/ Susan Werner
“Testing In Only One Standardized Way Is Unethical
One could make an argument that standardized testing must be the measure that teachers use because it is the measure required for state testing. However, not only is standardized testing inaccurate, I would also argue that it is and unethical means of evaluating students.
Constructed by Mary DeFalco Re visited 5/9/23
Assessing Poetry
Organizing and Evaluating Results from Multiple Reading Assessments by Jim Rubin
Text Level rdg. Standardized tests Cloze test Informal Rdg. I RunningRecord
ability scores (%) % correct based on 10 based on accuracy rate
questions (IRI)
Frustration < 70 <40 <7 < 90
Instructional 70-84 40-60 7-8 90-94
Independent 85-100 > 60 9-10 95-100
Other Assessments
★Teaching Beginning Readers/Linking Assessment and Instruction J.Johns, S.d. Lenski, L.Elish-Piper All inclusive
✴Informal Reading Assessment- Word Lists
✴The Role of Informal Reading Inventories in Assessing Word Recognition March 6 , 2006 by Walpole and McKenna
✴Writing Known Word AssessmentMichigan
✴Types of Comprehension Questions Write Craft
Phonics /Phonemic
Awareness Assessment
★
Cool Tools/Florida - scroll down for phonemic awareness and phonic assessements
Rigby PM Benchmark Primary Literacy Kit
For Levels 1 - 8:
• Introduce the selected text by reading the title and discussing the cover.
• Read the book introduction provided.
• Have students take a few minutes to look through the book to orient them to the story. Say, “Look at the pictures and see if you can tell what this story is about.”
• When the student is ready, begin taking the running record.
• Score students on accuracy
For Levels 9 – 30:
• Read the book introduction to the student.
• Send the student off to read the book silently.
• When the student is done, have them come back to the table.
• Put the book aside and have the student retell the story (Use the Retell Scoring Guide).
• If they don’t have the basic of the who, what, where, why after retelling, then use the comprehension questions provided or your own questions to determine the student’s level of understanding.
• Score students on accuracy, comprehension and fluency.
Appendix D 1ame_____________________________________ Date___________
Criteria Checklist
Use this checklist as a way to focus your writing and to be sure that you have done your very best work. After you have completed your draft, reread your writing piece and check to be sure you have included all of the elements.
Narrative Elements
__ Does your writing piece have a beginning, middle, and end? __ Does your writing piece have a well-described setting?
__ Does your writing piece have well-developed characters?
Expository Elements
__ Does your writing piece include information about a topic?
__ Does your writing piece include at least five facts or pieces of information on the topic? __ Can your facts or pieces of information be proved in a reference source?
Writing Mechanics
__ Did you check your writing piece for spelling mistakes?
__ Did you check your writing piece for capitalization and punctuation? __ Did you check your writing piece for correct paragraphing?
Overall
__ Does your writing piece “flow”—meaning that the fiction and nonfiction elements fit nicely together, so your writing is not choppy?
Source: Affinito, S. (2010). Blending fiction and nonfiction to improve comprehension and writing skills. ReadWriteThink. Retrieved from http://www.readwritethink.org/classroom-resources/lesson-plans/blending-fiction-nonfiction-improve- 262.html?tab=4#tabs
Copyright 2010 IRA/NCTE. All rights reserved. ReadWriteThink materials may be reproduced for educational purposes